HOOSIER FREEDOM SERIES

WHAT DOES THE AMERICAN DREAM MEAN TO YOU?

SEPTEMBER 24, 2014
7:00PM
DELAWARE TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER
9094 EAST 131ST STREET
FISHERS, INDIANA

For many Hoosier men and women, the American Dream means being able to turn passion into a profit. But the path to success isn’t always easy. Join us for a discussion with three entrepreneurs who have experienced firsthand the sacrifices and rewards of starting and maintaining a small business in central Indiana.

REGISTER TODAY!!
www.HoosierFreedomSeries.com

Please RSVP by Tuesday, September 23

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Common Core’s Growing Unpopularity

Phyllis Schlafly | Aug 12, 2014

The highly acclaimed school standards called Common Core are becoming so unpopular that they may soon be politically untouchable. The critics are piling on from Glenn Beck to the Wall Street Journal, with senior academics and activist parents in-between.

The latest is a detailed criticism of the mathematics standards by a prize-winning math professor at the University of California at Berkeley, Marina Ratner. It is refreshing that her criticisms are very specific and include examples of assignments that parents can see are ridiculous.

Professor Ratner became alerted to the stupidity of Common Core by looking at the homework assigned to her grandson in 6th grade Berkeley middle school. Fractions are taught by having the kids draw pictures of everything, such as 6 divided by 8, and 4 divided by 2/7, and also by creating fictional stories for such things as 2/3 divided by 3/4. A student who gives the correct answer right away and doesn’t draw a picture or make up a story loses points.

Ms. Ratner concluded that Common Core is making simple math concepts “artificially intricate and complex with the pretense of being deeper, while the actual content taught was primitive.” The bottom line is that Common Core is inferior to the current good California standards, and the $15.8 billion spent nationally to develop and adopt Common Core was a gigantic waste.

College ready? That’s another deceit. Math experts are saying that Common Core standards are not preparing students for colleges to which most parents aspire to send their children.

The Common Core History Standards have just become available. Real scholars say they are a “stealthy” plan to teach kids a leftwing curriculum.

Scholar Stanley Kurtz says that the new plan for teaching American History is spelled out in the SAT college entrance and Advanced Placement exams. They pitch out “traditional emphasis on America’s founders and the principles of constitutional government” in favor of a leftist “emphasis on race, gender, class, ethnicity.”

According to Kurtz, “James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and the other founders are largely left out of the new test unless they are “presented as examples of conflict and identity by class, gender, race, ethnicity, etc.” The text of the new AP U.S. History exam has been closely guarded, revealed only to a few certified AP U.S. History teachers who are sworn to secrecy.

Parents who are attentive to their children’s studies and homework have been up in arms against Common Core for many months. Now Common Core has become such a big issue that it’s beginning to bring the politicians into line with what the public is demanding.

Indiana was the first state to show the political power of the anti-Common Core movement. The activist moms defeated a superintendent of education and several legislators on this issue.

Oklahoma made the biggest splash when the state legislature voted to repeal the state’s earlier endorsement of Common Core. The governor signed the repeal, but the unelected state board of education impudently filed suit to nullify the repeal, and then the Oklahoma state Supreme Court wisely upheld the elected legislature’s repeal.

South Carolina’s governor signed a bill repealing that state’s commitment to Common Core. North Carolina’s governor signed a more modest bill authorizing the state school board to tweak the standards.

The state of Texas, under Gov. Rick Perry, was smart enough to be one of the five states that never signed on to Common Core in the first place. But now the pressure is on to force Texas to use the new AP U.S. history exam anyway, and Texans claim that is illegal under state law.

Louisiana was one of the original 45 states that endorsed Common Core before the standards were even written. But one day Gov. Bobby Jindal actually read his son’s Common Core math homework, was shocked, and then issued an executive order to block its implementation in Louisiana.

Two more governors have just seen the light and turned against Common Core. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker announced that he wants the state legislature to repeal the standards when it reconvenes in January, and Gov. Gary Herbert of Utah ordered his attorney general to conduct a review of the controversial standards.

Hoping to line up the support of teachers, the Gates Foundation education chief is now urging states to wait two years before using Common Core tests to make decisions about teacher performance.

Like many do-gooders, Bill Gates is obsessed with the problem of inequality. However, Common Core’s way of trying to overcome inequality is by dumbing down all U.S. students and pretending, like the Lake Wobegon kids, that all children are above average.

Reacting to the growing opposition to Common Core, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the biggest money bag for Common Core, is now urging states to have a two-year moratorium on all states and school districts about to make any high-stakes decisions based on tests aligned to the new standards.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

C. Steven Tucker weighs in on the court’s Obamacare decision

An Obamacare authority weighs in on the D. C. District Court of Appeals decision…

C. Steven Tucker’s Expert Opinion

HUGE legal smack down to the IRS and Obamacare in the D.C. Court of Appeals this morning! This is the case I’ve been writing about for years. The premise began with Oklahoma A.G. Oklahoma Attorney General E. Scott Pruitt’s case back in 2011. Then came Halbig v. Burwell. Both cases pertained to the ILLEGAL action taken by the IRS granting themselves powers they were NOT granted in the original Obamacare law. Now it’s headed to the SCOTUS but if we prevail at that level 57 MILLION Americans will be FREED from Obamacare’s “individual mandate”. It will be the beginning of the end of Obamacare.

The biggest threat to Obamacare yet is right around the corner.

http://csteventucker.wordpress.com/2014/07/20/the-biggest-threat-to-obamacare-yet-is-right-around-the-corner/

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Obama’s Scary Plan for Preschoolers

http://www.eagleforum.org/publications/educate/july14/obamas-scary-plan-for-preschoolers.html

On May 2, 2014, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Kathleen Sebelius gave a speech to the Committee for Economic Development. She touted “an exciting investment opportunity.” She claims the investment “promises solid dividends and long-term growth” and states “its payout ratio is so solid that it’s projected to return at least $7 for every dollar that’s put in.” To what investment does the HHS secretary refer? “Infants and toddlers in those precious early years from birth to kindergarten.” (HHS.gov, 5-4-14)

Most parents don’t think of their children as an investment and some may be disturbed to hear a federal official speaking about them in those terms, especially to the Committee for Economic Development. The CED describes itself as “a group of business and education leaders committed to improving the growth and productivity of the U.S. economy, a freer global trading system, and greater opportunity for all Americans.” (CED.org) Parents may not approve of this plan whose aim seems to be to turn out cogs for the industrial machine rather than educated citizens.

While explaining President Obama’s “Early Childhood Package,” Sebelius in her May speech points out other programs that she claims are good for America: the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare; expansion of Medicaid; reauthorization and expansion of the Children’s Health Insurance Program or CHIP; and the expansion of Head Start.

Obama’s Early Childhood Package

What is Obama’s Early Childhood Package? According to Sebelius, the plan is that all preschool children “should have an opportunity to be in a high-quality learning environment and acquire social, emotional, and educational skills at the same time.” The first part of the plan is “universal preschool for every four-year-old child in America.” It is unclear whether this is intended to be mandatory. Sebelius offers the following to show just how far behind she thinks America is:

In Japan, virtually every 4-year-old attends preschool. In Britain, 97% of 4-year-olds are enrolled in preschool. And by 2020, China plans to provide 80% of its three- and four-year-olds with preschool education.

But is that something that American parents want and are those countries that America wishes to emulate?

Sebelius laments Economist magazine’s assertion that America ranks 26th among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development nation members in percentage of four-year-olds in preschool and 24th for three-year-olds. But maybe some American families prefer to keep their children home during those tender years.

Referring to research by Harvard University’s Center on the Developing Child, Sebelius claims that babies and toddlers “develop 700 new neurological connections every single second,” a phenomenon that is “the foundation upon which all later learning, behavior, and health depend.” Does it not occur to Sebelius and federal officials that many parents choose to be with their own children during this crucial time rather than entrusting them to someone else?

Head Start Grants

The next goal of Obama’s package is to “grow the supply of effective early learning opportunities for our children,” including new “Early Head Start-Child Care partnerships through which we award competitive grants to communities that make Early Head Start available to more families.” Sebelius claims, “We know from a wide array of research that the investments we make in early childhood initiatives put those kids on a path to learn more in school, and earn more in the workplace.” It is unclear to what research she is referring because actual research shows that Head Start is a failed program: any gains made by young children disappear in the early grades and, in fact, there is evidence that some children are harmed by the program. (See April, 2013 Education Reporter)

Yet, as stated at the HHS Administration for Children and Families website, Obama’s plan “will maintain and build on current Head Start investments, to support a greater share of infants, toddlers, and three-year-olds in America’s Head Start centers.” (HHS.gov). The federal government seems intent that infants and toddlers be away from their own homes and enrolled in an institutional setting.

This is also the premise of President Obama’s proposal that “encourages states to expand the availability of full-day kindergarten.” Claiming that “only 6 out of 10 of America’s kindergarten students have access to a full day of learning,” the Obama administration wants all children to spend the “time they need in school to reach rigorous benchmarks and standards.”

Critics worry that this drive to get young children out of family life and into institutions is harmful; they believe young children can learn while being with their own parents and caregivers chosen by their parents.

Voluntary Home Visitation

The final part of Obama’s Early Childhood package is “voluntary home visitation.” The visitations are to be conducted by “nurses, social workers, and other trained professionals.” Sebelius also favorably mentions pediatricians who can “screen for … parental depression.” The visitation program aims to start with low-income families. To some it sounds as if the federal government doubts the ability of low-income parents to parent their own children without federal supervision and monitoring.

Once the visitation program gets started, it is not certain that it would be limited by income levels; the intrusion could soon be manifest in all families. There is little doubt that some want these federal programs to become universal. Sebelius promotes the Health and Human Services “Watch Me Thrive!” program that creates “universal developmental and behavioral screenings, so that we can track a child’s progress in areas like language, social development, and motor development.” In what may seem to some to be double-speak, Sebelius claims these intrusions by the government into the family are “based on the premise that a child’s best and most important teachers are a child’s parents.” As Ronald Reagan said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Sebelius’s speech was in part an attempt to gain financial support from the CED and its members; the other funding method she mentions is an increase in the tobacco tax.

Perhaps the most disingenuous part of Sebelius’s speech is when she claims that further federal intrusion into families will result in “more of our kids realiz[ing] their fullest potential” and says it will allow us to “benefit from a new generation of innovation, entrepreneurship, poetry, discovery, art, and progress.” This is said by an official of the same federal government that is pushing Common Core education standards, which spell the death knell for poetry, art, and the individual creativity that leads to discovery, innovation, and entrepreneurship because students are allowed to learn only what is tested on standardized tests.

RTT Early Learning Challenge

The Obama administration’s Race To The Top Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) has awarded over $1 billion to supposedly “provide a strong start for our nation’s youngest children.” At the Dept. of Education website it states: “RTT-ELC supports states in their systemic efforts to align, coordinate, and improve the quality of existing early learning and development programs across multiple funding streams that support children from birth through age five.” (Ed.gov)

As with Common Core Race to the Top grants, ELC-winning states had to jump through federal hoops in order to be considered winners; they will remain under federal scrutiny, having been given mandates about how awarded money will be spent. As with Common Core, the federal government is asserting control over decisions states should be making on their own and this will result in loss of local control.

HHS Sec. Sebelius will be replaced by Sylvia Burwell. After a stint in the Clinton administration, Burwell moved to Microsoft where she was a key aide to Common Core’s major funder and most powerful champion, Bill Gates. Observers expect that future alliances between the Depts. of Education and Health and Human Services will remain aimed at further diminishing states’ rights in favor of federal bureaucratic control of individuals, families, and education.

But Is It Good For Children?

Contrary to what Sec. Sebelius and her cronies believe, parents know what is best for their children. Swedish educator Jonas Himmelstrand, writing in the Huffington Post Canada (11-5-13), states that “the Swedish approach is that the state has taken over raising children from parents through the state run daycare system.” He notes that as a result of the universal preschool/daycare system in Sweden, “education outcomes are declining, teens are anxiety-ridden and misbehaving, and the quality of parenting is suffering.” Swedish parents accepted the government’s offer of free preschool for children from 18-months-old through kindergarten; the result has not proven good for children, families, or education. A study by Trends in International Mathematics and Science shows that “disorder in Swedish classrooms is among the worst among comparable countries.” Evidence indicates that “[Swedish] children are simply not sufficiently emotionally nourished to be teachable in school.”

In response to campaigns to get children out of the family home at younger and younger ages, society in general, and parents in particular, should take Jonas Himmelstrand’s advice to heart:

Child care must be a parental decision based on the needs of the child, not a state decision based on politics and the economy. The state needs to remain neutral to all forms of care — daycare, home care, nanny, granny care, and neighbor care — and not support one form of care above another.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Join us at Carmelfest

Please join us at Carmelfest today from 4-10 and tomorrow from noon-10:30. The Constitutional Patriots booth is #65 and all of our proceeds will go to Indy Honor Flight. Good food, good music, vendors, fireworks and support our awesome World War II veterans!!!

If you can’t make it to Carmelfest please use the donate button to make a contribution. ALL the proceeds go to Indy Honor Flight. Please learn more about them at the website below.

http://www.indyhonorflight.org/

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Indiana’s “new” standards virtually mirror Common Core National standards

FoxNews.com Kyle Olson June 21, 2014

When Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin signed a bill repealing Common Core national standards from her state’s schools, it was perhaps the most ironic moment in the fight over the initiative.

Fallin is chairwoman of the National Governors Association, one of the private groups that hold the copyright of Common Core. (Yes, this marks the first time in history a private group has owned school standards.)

While Fallin wasn’t governor at the time the standards were created and adopted, she nonetheless rejected her own organization’s initiative.

In the same week, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley signed a bill to repeal Common Core and require the state to design its own standards for the 2015-2016 school year.

Indiana has repealed Common Core, too, though the replacement standards are largely seen as a disappointment because they virtually mirror the national standards.

Legislation is also making its way through the North Carolina legislature that would repeal Common Core there, as well.

“We want high standards. If there are pieces or components of Common Core that you think are age appropriate, they can take those individual pieces, but as a whole … we want more rigorous standards,” bill sponsor Rep. Bryan Holloway said.

In Oklahoma, after signing the bill, Fallin said, “Common Core was created with that well-intentioned goal in mind. … It was originally designed as a state-led – not federal – initiative that each state could choose to voluntarily adopt.

“Unfortunately, federal overreach has tainted Common Core. President Obama and Washington bureaucrats have usurped Common Core in an attempt to influence state education standards. The results are predictable. What should have been a bipartisan policy is now widely regarded as the president’s plan to establish federal control of curricula, testing and teaching strategies.”

Fallin’s 180-degree turn on Common Core was four years in the making, and was the result of valiant, persistent efforts from parents like Jenni White.

The parents started with “one legislator who wrote a bill for us to simply repeal Common Core from law,” White, the leader of Restore Oklahoma Public Education tells me.

“It wasn’t heard by the committee chairmen in either the Senate or the House in 2011 or 2012. In 2013, we had a bill for a task force to simply study the costs of the standards that made it through the rules committee, but was not brought to the House floor for a vote.

“This year we had several rallies, including one where 350 people came to the capitol at 9 a.m. to sit in an early Senate education committee meeting. There were people in the halls and standing room only in the Senate committee room and that seemed to turn the tide in our direction,” she says.

But to hear Common Core advocates, none of this is happening.

The once credible Fordham Institute has been a virtual Baghdad Bob of Common Core proponents, denying there’s a strong, reasoned anti-Common Core movement afoot just as Saddam Hussein’s spokesman denied American troops were in Iraq while news footage showed them tearing across the desert.

Fordham’s Michael Brickman jetted to Oklahoma to plead with the governor to veto the bill.

“Governor Fallin now faces a consequential crossroad of whether to stand up for strong education standards or to bend to vocal political critics,” Brickman wrote in a last-minute analysis.

Despite how Brickman framed it, Fallin sided with states’ rights and against the federal creep into American schools. And she dismissed the absurd notion that the Common Core national standards are the only way to raise the bar in schools. Only DC education elites could believe that.

Action in Oklahoma, South Carolina and North Carolina indicates the Common Core dam may be breaking.

In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal signed an executive order that requires his state to develop its own standards, and drops it out of the two main federally-funded testing consortia.

Missouri legislators have passed HB 1490, which would repeal Common Core in their state. It now sits on the desk of Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon.

In Ohio, activists are attempting to seize on the energy from the other states and recently held a rally at the statehouse. Some 300 people showed up.

At the rally, Rep. John Adams announced he is circulating a discharge petition to force a floor vote on repeal legislation.

“Why do we choose to use federal standards? Money. Politics. Failed leadership,” Adams said.

By the way, all of these states have something in common: Republican governors and Republican-dominated legislatures.

Fallin’s analysis of the situation is poignant and causes one to wonder why other states aren’t responding as her state did, unless they’re so hooked on federal money or so fearful of (or comfortable with) their Washington overlords that they wouldn’t dare raise a hackle.

When the final analysis of the Common Core debacle is done, it will likely be concluded states shouldn’t adopt substantial policy changes willy-nilly, all in the name of attracting federal cash. Because it always ends precisely how Fallin describes it.

The only ones left defending it will be the Baghdad Bobs insisting it is the “critics” – read: parents – to blame, not the incompetent power-grabbers in Washington.

Kyle Olson is founder of Education Action Group and EAGnews.org, a news service dedicated to education reform and school spending research, reporting, analysis and commentary.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Common Core & Communism

Common Core and Communism
By Alan Caruba, 2014
“A lie told often enough becomes the truth,” said Vladimir Lenin who led the revolution that imposed Communism on Russia.
When he wrote, ‘Mein Kampf’, Adolf Hitler said “whoever has the youth has the future.” In his vision for the Nazi Party, education would be the key that ensured that he had ‘the youth’ of Germany fully indoctrinated.
All dictators and authoritarian regimes know that what is taught in their schools offers the greatest opportunity to maintain control over their societies.
That is what has been occurring since the introduction of the Common Core standards that the Obama regime has imposed on our national education system and the good news is that protests against it from concerned parents and others are beginning to increase and gain momentum.
Teachers will tell you that “one size fits all” does not apply in the classroom and never has. Children learn at a different pace with some doing so rapidly while others need extra help and attention. Learning that is entirely dependent on ceaseless testing puts stress on every child and that is the most common complaint about Common Core.
Education in America has been in decline since the 1960s when the teachers unions gained control over the process, putting themselves between the local boards of education and parents. Would it surprise anyone to learn that the Department of Education was established by President Jimmy Carter who signed it into law in 1979? It began operation on May 4, 1980. You will find no reference, no mention of education in the U.S. Constitution and it should not be a function of the federal government.
In a recent commentary by Joy Pullmann in The Daily Caller, she said, “The latest scheme is the field testing of Common Core assessments. This spring more than four million kids will be required to spend hours on tests that have little connection to what they learned in class this year and will provide their teachers and schools no information about what the kids know.”
“Parents who object to this scheme,” said Pullman, “face bullying and harassment from public officials. From New York to Denver to California, some schools are responding by forcing kids who opt out to sit at their desks and do nothing during the several-hour tests. Normal people call that a ‘time out’ and it is a punishment.”
Wyoming has become the first State to block a new set of national science standards that address climate change. In Michigan last year a group of protesters stopped the State from adopting the science standards.
Here are some excerpts of what the science standards teach as “The Essential Principles of Climate Science.”
# “The impacts of climate change may affect the security of nations. Reduced availability of water, food, and land can lead to competition and conflict among humans, potentially resulting in large groups of climate refugees.”
# “Humans may be able to mitigate climate change or lessens its severity by reducing greenhouse gas concentrations through processes that move carbon out of the atmosphere or reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”
# “The most immediate strategy is conservation of oil, gas, and coal, which we rely on as fuels for most of our transportation, heating, cooling, agriculture, and electricity. Short-term strategies involve switching from carbon-intensive to renewable energy sources, which also requires building new infrastructure for alternative energy sources.”
From “A Framework for K-12 Science Education” children are to be taught that “If Earth’s global mean temperature continues to rise, the lives of humans and other organisms will be affected in many different ways.” Only the Earth’s mean temperature is not rising! The planet is in a natural cooling cycle that is now seventeen years old, meaning that none of the students in today’s schools have ever experienced a single day of “global warming.”
By the end of grade 8, the Framework teaches that “Human activities have significantly altered the biosphere, sometimes damaging or destroying natural habitats and causing the extinction of many other species.” This, too, is untrue. The U.S. Endangered Species Act, despite listing thousands of species, has not officially “saved” more than a handful at best and this assertion is questionable.
By the end of grade 12, students are expected to believe that “Changes in the atmosphere due to human activity have increased carbon dioxide concentrations and thus affect climate.” While it is true that there has been an increase in the amount of carbon dioxide this is a good thing because it is an essential factor in the increase of all vegetation that includes food crops and healthier forests. Moreover, this increase does not play any role in the Earth’s climate.
The central theme of these “science standards” is to teach that we should be reducing our use of fossil fuels, the primary energy sources our nation and the world requires. What these standards do in reality is repeat and reinforce federal government laws and regulations to justify its CO2 emissions regulations based on the current method of computing the Social Cost of Carbon, but these “costs” are pure fiction.
None of the computer models that have predicted global warming over the past four decades have been accurate. None are capable of representing the state of the Earth’s vastly complex climate.
The sooner Common Core is removed from the nation’s education system, the better.

Editor’s Note: To learn more or follow the debate on Common Core, visit
The Heartland Institute’s “Education Weekly” newsletter that provides data via Common Core Watch.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Anti-Common Core Candidates Trounce Indiana Incumbents In Primaries

May 8, 2014
By Joy Pullmann

On Tuesday, two nationally-eyed primaries here in Indiana had Tea Party challengers knocking out sitting state representatives over two major issues: National Common Core education mandates and GOP leaders’ refusal to protect natural marriage despite supermajorities in both houses.

Curt Nisly and Christopher Judy beat Reps. Rebecca Kubacki and Kathy Heuer handily with 65 percent and 57 percent, respectively, of the votes tallied by the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette’s press time Tuesday. Dozens of motivated moms, dads, and grandparents had spent Saturdays canvassing quiet suburban neighborhoods on Judy and Nisly’s behalf, passing out flyers while wearing navy shirts that read, “Common sense, not Common Core.”

Although Politico reported, “Nisly and Judy both put up a major fight against the Common Core in the state and made the fight against the standards one of their top campaign issues,” and Common Core has perhaps been Indiana’s hottest political topic for the past year, local outlets are pretending the race’s outcome is largely due, instead, to support for natural marriage. The Indianapolis Business Journal didn’t even mention Common Core as an electoral factor. The state’s flagship paper, the Indianapolis Star, only mentioned Common Core because a source quoted it, also spending their story noting Heuer and Kubacki’s refusal to vote for amending the state constitution to define marriage as one man, one woman.

Marriage was clearly important to the challengers’ teams, but Common Core was at least equal in importance. For one, Nisly filed for candidacy before either incumbent had voted against letting Indiana voters consider the marriage question. Heather Crossin and Erin Tuttle, co-founders of Hoosiers Against Common Core, had endorsed Judy and Nisly. The ladies are well-known both in-state and nationally for catalyzing the state’s retreat from Common Core. Last month, Indiana became the first state to drop Common Core, albeit for lower standards because Gov. Mike Pence insisted that Common Core proponents control the rewrite. Pence had endorsed Heuer, and Lt. Gov. Sue Ellspermann spent Election Day greeting voters at the polls in Heuer and Kubacki’s districts on the incumbents’ behalf. The state Chamber of Commerce, also a huge Common Core proponent, had also backed Heuer and Kubacki.

For months, grassroots leaders at Indiana anti-Common Core meetings had highlighted primary upsets as an effective way to make the state GOP stop trivializing their objections to the Obama administration-backed national testing and curriculum mandates.

Common Core supporters are nervous about this gaining traction, as evidenced by a new poll out last week. When given a pro-Common Core explanation, conservative primary voters who didn’t previously know about the standards tend to support them, by 55 to 39 percent, the poll says. By a 48 percent to 36 percent margin, Republican primary voters tended to support a candidate with a positive message about Common Core instead of one charging it was “developed in secret by the Obama administration.” But that’s a straw man: The folks who oppose Common Core don’t pretend Obama wrote them “in secret,” pointed out Neal McCluskey of the Cato Institute.

“This is just slightly less egregious—and maybe that’s being too kind—garbage polling than lots of the other push polls providing ‘neutral’ descriptions of the Core,” he said. The organization that commissioned this one receives funding from Common Core’s primary sponsor, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. See McCluskey’s critique of other Common Core polls.

Another recent poll tends to reinforce the Indiana primary results. The University of Connecticut found that that the more people know about Common Core, the less likely they are to support it. Of those who said they know “a great deal” about Common Core, 61 percent said it is bad policy.

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

Letter to the National Republican Senatorial Committee

April 17, 2014

NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
PO BOX 97112
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20090-7112

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:

YOU WILL NOT LIKE MY RESPONSES TO YOUR INANE QUESTIONNAIRE. AS A MATTER OF FACT, I DOUBT YOU WILL READ BEYOND THIS SENTENCE WHEN YOU NOTICE THERE IS NO CHECK ENCLOSED. AT LEAST I’LL HAVE THE SATISFACTION OF EXPRESSING MY CANDID THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS.

I HAVE BEEN FILLING OUT THESE RIDICULOUS QUESTIONNAIRES FOR MANY YEARS NOW. I USED TO BE PLEASED THAT YOU WANTED MY INPUT. NOW, I FINALLY GET IT; YOU REALLY ONLY WANT THE MONEY.

I AM A MALE VOTER, 80 YEARS OF AGE AND VOTED REPUBLICAN EVER SINCE I FELL FOR THE CHARM OF JOHN F. KENNEDY ONLY TO BE TURNED OFF BY LYNDON B. JOHNSON. I HAVE VOTED IN VIRTUALLY EVERY ELECTION SINCE I TURNED EIGHTEEN. I GET MY NEWS FROM FOX NEWS. THE NETWORK NEWS CHANNELS AND MOST OTHER NEWS MEDIA ARE SO BIASED THAT I DON’T BOTHER LISTENING OR READING THEIR BLATTER. THEY ARE REALLY DOING A LOUSY JOB OF KEEPING AMERICAN CITIZENS INFORMED AS TO WHAT IS REALLYGOING ON WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. IT IS SO BAD, IT ALMOST BORDERS ON TREASON.

9. DO I BELIEVE IN SPENDING CUTS? WHAT KIND OF QUESTION IS THIS? HOW COULD ANYONE WHO RUNS A FAMILY OR A BUSINESS NOT BELIEVE IN SPENDING CUTS? WE ALL KNOW WE NEED TO LIVE WITHIN OUR INCOME. I HAVE BEEN ANSWERING YES TO THIS QUESTION FOR PROBABLY TWENTY YEARS. AND WHAT HAS THAT GOTTEN ME? ANOTHER TWELVE TRILLION IN DEBT UNDER BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES. HOW COULD YOU LET THIS HAPPEN YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR?

10. DO I THINK OBAMA’S POLICIES HAVE SLOWED JOB GROWTH? HELL, YES I DO. MY QUESTION TO YOU IS WHY HAS CONGRESS ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN?

11. AM I AGAINST CARD CHECK. AGAIN, HELL YES I AM. WHY HAS CONGRESS ALLOWED UNIONS TO ORGANIZE GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS?

12. DO I FAVOR INCOME TAX REFORM? ABSOLUTELY, AS I HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR TWENTY YEARS. OBVIOUSLY, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN LISTENING.

13. DO I THINK PRESIDENT OBAMA IS NOT SERIOUS ABOUT CONTROLLING SPENDING? HE ISN’T AND NEITHER ARE YOU.

15. DO I SUPPORT A BALANCED BUDGET ADMENDMENT? SEE MY ANSWER TO QUESTION 13.

16. DO I SUPPORT GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF PRIVATE COMPANIES? NO, I DO NOT.
WHY DID CONGRESS ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN UNDER THIS ADMINISTRATION?

17. IS THERE TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM?
WHAT FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM? GOVERNMENT IS SO TIGHT WITH BIG BUSINESS AND SPECIAL INTERESTS THAT FREE ENTERPRISE IS A FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION.

18. DO I SUPPORT REPUBLICAN EFFORTS TO REPEAL OBAMACARE? I AM IN FAVOR OF THE REPUBLICANS COMING UP WITH PROPOSED SOLUTIONS TO HEALTH CARE PROBLEMS THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS CAN AGREE WITH. CONSTANTLY BASHING OBAMACARE IS GOING TO GET YOU NO WHERE REAL FAST. REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN HANDED A WINNING ISSUE ON A SILVER PLATTER, BUT I’M NOT OPTIMISTIC THAT YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH IT.

21. AM I AGAINST CAP AND TRADE? OF COURSE I’M AGAINST IT. TOO BAD CONGRESS HAS ABDICATED ITS AUTHORITY AND ALLOWED THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH TO EFFECTIVELY GO AHEAD WITH THIS TRAVESTY.

22. DO I FAVOR A PERMANENT BAN ON TAXPAYER FUNDING OF ABORTION? WHY DO YOU LET DEMOCRATS MAKE THIS SUCH A BIG ISSUE? THE WAY REPUBLICANS HAVE HANDLED THIS LENDS CREDENCE TO THE REDICULOUS “REPUBLICAN WAR ON WOMEN” BATTLE CRY OF THE LEFT. YOU BETTER GET A LOT SMARTER ON DEALING WITH THESE KINDS OF ISSUES.

23. DO I FAVOR SCHOOL CHOICE? I FAVOR SCHOOL CHOICE AND LOCAL CONTROL OF EDUCATION. WHY HAVE YOU ALLOWED STATES TO BE COERCED INTO ADOPTING THE FEDERAL CONTROLLED COMMON CORE? ABOLISH THE FEDERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT.

25. DO I PREFER JUDGES WHO STRICTLY INTERPRET THE LAW? ABSOLUTELY. WITH THE SUPREME COURT APPROVAL OF OBAMACARE, I AM BEGINNING TO LOSE FAITH IN OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUST AS I HAVE LOST FAITH IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

26. SHOULD MORE BE DONE TO SECURE OUR BORDER? ONE OF MY PET PEEVES. HOW IN THE WORLD CAN REPUBLICANS LOOK THEMSELVES IN THE MIRROR WITHOUT DISGUST FOR NOT SECURING THE BORDER AFTER 9/11. YOU WERE IN POWER AND DID NOTHING. HOW MANY ENEMIES HAVE INFILTRATED THE COUNTRY IN THE PAST TWELVE YEARS? THIS ISSUE AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS WE FACE ARE THE MAJOR REASONS WHY I NOT LONGER HAVE CONFIDENCE THAT GOVERNMENT WILL DO THE RIGHT THING. THESE TWO ISSUES ARE ALSO WHY I SEE LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS IN WASHINGTON.

27. IS IT IMPORTANT FOR THE UNITED STATES TO MAINTAIN A STRONG MILITARY? ONLY IF WE VALUE OUR FREEDOMS AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE. SEE WHAT I MEAN BY INANE QUESTIONS? MAYBE STUPID IS A BETTER WORD.

28. DO I FEEL THE WHITE HOUSE IS COVERING UP ABOUT BENGHAZI? NOT ONLY DO I BELIEVE THIS, I BELIEVE COVER UP HAS BECOME A BASIC STRATEGY OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL.

30. DO I SUPPORT THE NRSC MISSION OF ELECTING A NEW GOP-LED SENATE. ONLY IF THESE LEADERS ARE TRULY CONSERVATIVES WHO WILL RESTORE THE COUNTRY TO A CONSTITUTIONAL, FISCALLY SOUND, MILITARILY STRONG NATION THAT BEGINS TO REWARD
CITIZENS FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR AND STOPS REWARDING BAD BEHAVIOR.

START SHOWING SOME POSITIVE RESULTS, THEN WE CAN TALK ABOUT CONTRIBUTIONS.

HANS COLLINS
CARMEL, IN

Posted in Articles | Leave a comment

FOX News and Common Core

I’m sure most of you have seen the ads even on FOX News about Common Core. Here is a Malkin article about the new ad campaign trying to save Common Core. Note that Achieve has received 37 mil. from Gates to promote CC. Then ask yourself why in the world IN is asking the advice of 2 Achieve employees on our new standards.

http://michellemalkin.com/2014/03/21/get-to-know-the-common-core-marketing-overlords/

Posted in General | Leave a comment